DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC (DUOT) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC (DUOT) institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2026Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy175,415264,415$1,813,887
Q4 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-90,51389,000$1,001,250
Q3 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy166,613179,513$1,321,216
Q1 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-3,99912,900$36
Q4 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-14,38116,899$87
Q3 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-8,62031,280$194
Q2 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy6,37039,900$409
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy14,03033,530$366
Q4 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy19,50019,500$83

Frequently asked questions about DUOT activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying DUOT?

    Institutional owners buying DUOT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in DUOT activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in DUOT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP INC (DUOT) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in DUOT increasing?

    Institutional interest in DUOT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.