Bank Of Hawaii Investment Changes: Q2 2026 Focus on Growth ETFs
This quarter, Bank of Hawaii significantly increased its position in VUG and other growth-oriented holdings while reducing exposure to broad market index funds.
As reported by insiderset.com for the period ending June 30th, 2026 (Q2), Bank of Hawaii, a prominent financial institution based in Honolulu, saw notable shifts across its investment portfolio. The total portfolio value stood at $2.01 billion as of that date.
One of the most striking changes was an increase in holdings for Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Despite a slight reduction in share count (-695,694 shares), its portfolio allocation percentage remained relatively stable at 8.33%, indicating continued confidence in this core developed market holding.
Significant buying activity was observed across several holdings. The largest increase by weight was seen in Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VUG), which saw its portfolio allocation jump from 8.33% to a substantial 8.24%. This might seem counterintuitive, but the share increase was considerable (+1,594,078 shares), contributing significantly to this change in percentage terms due to overall portfolio rebalancing.
Other notable purchases included iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), which experienced a significant share increase (+145,727 shares) and allocation rise to 0.84%, suggesting a potential diversification effort into fixed income or government bonds.
Additionally, iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), despite the share increase, showed a large percentage decrease (-55.75%) from its prior period position and exited the portfolio entirely by June 30th.
Bank of Hawaii also added positions to iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), increasing shares (+145,727) but decreasing its overall portfolio allocation percentage from 8.33% to just 0.84%. This indicates a significant reduction in the weight of this holding relative to the entire portfolio.
Furthermore, iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), despite the share increase (+145,727), showed a large percentage decrease (-55.75%) from its prior period position and exited the portfolio entirely by June 30th.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Other notable exits or reductions include iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), which decreased shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Bank of Hawaii also exited iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%.
Furthermore, the bank significantly reduced its position in iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting this holding.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.
Conversely, there were significant reductions in holdings for iShares Core World Government Bonds ETF (IWP), decreasing shares (-145,727) and its portfolio allocation percentage by 55.75%, effectively exiting the position.