AGCO CORP (AGCO) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

AGCO CORP (AGCO). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Tweedy, Browne Co All Funds (US), Olstein Capital Management, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Third Avenue Management.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2014Third Avenue ManagementBuy1,006,4781,006,478$56,584
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-96,200185,800$10,249
Q4 2013Atlantic Investment ManagementSell-30,895300,000$17,757
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy102,100282,000$17,038
Q3 2013Atlantic Investment ManagementSell-7,972330,895$19,993
Q2 2013Atlantic Investment ManagementBuy338,867338,867$17,008
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy179,900179,900$9,029

Frequently asked questions about AGCO activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying AGCO?

    Institutional owners buying AGCO include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in AGCO activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in AGCO compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to AGCO CORP (AGCO) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in AGCO increasing?

    Institutional interest in AGCO can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.