(AZUL) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

AZUL. Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Oaktree Capital Management, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Causeway Capital Management.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2018Oaktree Capital ManagementBuy118,4421,873,216$33,325
Q2 2018Oaktree Capital ManagementBuy685,1001,754,774$28,708
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy288,200598,400$20,794
Q1 2018Oaktree Capital ManagementSell-98,6671,069,674$37,171
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy181,000310,200$7,392
Q4 2017Oaktree Capital ManagementBuy13,6001,168,341$27,841
Q3 2017Oaktree Capital ManagementBuy169,1001,154,741$31,698
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy129,200129,200$3,547
Q2 2017Oaktree Capital ManagementBuy985,641985,641$20,763

Frequently asked questions about AZUL activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying AZUL?

    Institutional owners buying AZUL include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in AZUL activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in AZUL compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to AZUL rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in AZUL increasing?

    Institutional interest in AZUL can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.