CADENCE DESIGN SYS INC (CDNS) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

CADENCE DESIGN SYS INC (CDNS) institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Jensen Investment Management, Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Parnassus Endeavor Fund.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2014Tiger Global ManagementBuy1,115,0001,115,000$17,327
Q1 2014Dodge & Cox Stock FundSell-98,86719,260,875$299,314
Q4 2013Dodge & Cox Stock FundSell-235,00019,359,742$271,424
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-839,6011,816,999$24,548
Q3 2013Dodge & Cox Stock FundSell-173,78319,594,742$264,529
Q2 2013Dodge & Cox Stock FundBuy19,768,52519,768,525$286,248
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy2,656,6002,656,600$38,468

Frequently asked questions about CDNS activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying CDNS?

    Institutional owners buying CDNS include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in CDNS activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CDNS compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CADENCE DESIGN SYS INC (CDNS) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in CDNS increasing?

    Institutional interest in CDNS can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.

Related CDNS insights