CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP (CECO) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP (CECO). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include First Eagle U.S. Value, Polen Capital Management, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Olstein Capital Management.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2014Olstein Capital ManagementBuy50,000127,000$1,980
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-40,16119,593$305
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-146,14759,754$991
Q1 2014Olstein Capital ManagementBuy47,00077,000$1,277
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-143,980205,901$3,326
Q4 2013Olstein Capital ManagementBuy30,00030,000$485
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy186,784349,881$4,926
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy163,097163,097$2,006

Frequently asked questions about CECO activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying CECO?

    Institutional owners buying CECO include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in CECO activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CECO compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CECO ENVIRONMENTAL CORP (CECO) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in CECO increasing?

    Institutional interest in CECO can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.