CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES IN (CMT) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES IN (CMT) during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of CMT during the latest reporting period was Renaissance Technologies LLC, which increased its reported CMT position by approximately $270,417.009 based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in CMT exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES IN (CMT). InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $535,039.11 in reported CMT exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES IN's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy12,200511,247$10,506,126
Q2 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy16,300499,047$8,279,190
Q4 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy54495,718$8,199,176
Q1 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy10,700527,464$9,985
Q2 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy40,410566,274$12,883
Q1 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy55,605525,864$9,460
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy19,810656,664$7,700
Q4 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy71,950636,854$8,967
Q3 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy17,040564,904$5,005
Q2 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy19,401547,864$2,257
Q3 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,400538,213$3,450
Q1 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy16,000531,420$3,922
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy79,400516,300$3,444
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy200436,900$7,790
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy15,900436,700$9,476
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy40,485420,800$9,232
Q2 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy45,915380,315$8,219
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy21,700334,400$5,962
Q4 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy5,100312,700$5,350
Q2 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy30,700334,800$4,570
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy126,200397,500$9,079
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy6,390271,300$4,658
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,060264,910$3,709
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,050256,850$3,678
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy5,800255,800$3,325
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy32,000250,000$3,183
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy9,500218,000$2,987
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy5,600208,500$1,997
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy202,900202,900$1,810

Frequently asked questions about CMT activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying CMT?

    Institutional owners buying CMT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in CMT activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CMT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES IN (CMT) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in CMT increasing?

    Institutional interest in CMT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.