ISHARES RUSSELL 3000 ETF (IWV) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


ISHARES RUSSELL 3000 ETF (IWV) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Matrix Private Capital Group, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Mairs & Power Growth Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy5003,000$765
Q3 2021Matrix Private Capital GroupSell-504,400$1,121
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-3,3002,500$593
Q1 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-7005,800$860
Q4 2019Matrix Private Capital GroupBuy4,4504,450$839
Q4 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy6,5006,500$1,225

Frequently asked questions about IWV activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying IWV?

    Institutional owners buying IWV include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in IWV activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in IWV compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ISHARES RUSSELL 3000 ETF (IWV) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in IWV increasing?

    Institutional interest in IWV can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.