IXN Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity
ISHARES GLOBAL TECH ETF (IXN). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Sequoia Financial Advisors, Mairs & Power Growth Fund, and Renaissance Technologies LLC.
Related IXN Institutional Insights
- IXN Institutional Ownership Overview
- IXN Top Institutional Shareholders
- IXN Institutional Buying Activity
- IXN Institutional Selling Activity
- IXN Institutional Ownership Trend
- Institutional Portfolio Overlap & Shared Holdings
- IXN Insider Trading & SEC Form 4 Activity
- Top Institutional Investor Stock Rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 3,600 | 5,200 | $823 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 1,600 | 1,600 | $246 |
Frequently asked questions about IXN activity
Which institutional owners are buying IXN?
Institutional owners buying IXN include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in IXN activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in IXN compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ISHARES GLOBAL TECH ETF (IXN) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in IXN increasing?
Institutional interest in IXN can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.