(KWR) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


(KWR) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q2 2024), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC and Durable Capital Partners. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-1,800121,900$10,440
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-29,001123,700$11,385
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-41,993152,701$10,947
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy61,975194,694$14,951
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy56,919132,719$10,462
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy21,10075,800$5,842
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy26,50054,700$3,996
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy28,20028,200$1,749

Frequently asked questions about KWR activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying KWR?

    Institutional owners buying KWR include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in KWR activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in KWR compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to KWR rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in KWR increasing?

    Institutional interest in KWR can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.