LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q3 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Sequoia Financial Advisors, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Muhlenkamp & Co. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy578,3981,322,155$10,366
Q4 2013Muhlenkamp & CoBuy28,450664,310$3,647
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy561,511743,757$4,083
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-66,054182,246$813
Q3 2013Muhlenkamp & CoSell-4,410635,860$2,836
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy248,300248,300$1,259
Q2 2013Muhlenkamp & CoBuy640,270640,270$3,246

Frequently asked questions about LSCC activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying LSCC?

    Institutional owners buying LSCC include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in LSCC activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LSCC compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to LATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP (LSCC) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in LSCC increasing?

    Institutional interest in LSCC can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.