(NOVT) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
(NOVT) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q3 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Olstein Capital Management. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- (NOVT) stock institutional ownership
- (NOVT) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2025 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 49,200 | 95,600 | $9,574,340 |
| Q2 2025 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 2,634 | 2,634 | $339,602 |
| Q2 2025 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 43,400 | 46,400 | $5,982,352 |
| Q1 2025 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -41,800 | 3,000 | $383,610 |
| Q3 2022 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 15,900 | 44,800 | $5,181 |
| Q2 2022 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 4,500 | 28,900 | $3,505 |
| Q1 2022 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 6,900 | 24,400 | $3,472 |
| Q2 2021 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -1,700 | 17,500 | $2,358 |
| Q1 2021 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 4,700 | 19,200 | $2,532 |
| Q4 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -45,700 | 14,500 | $1,714 |
| Q3 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 11,900 | 60,200 | $6,341 |
| Q2 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -24,900 | 48,300 | $5,157 |
| Q1 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -51,800 | 73,200 | $5,847 |
| Q4 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -122,200 | 125,000 | $11,055 |
| Q3 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -138,200 | 247,200 | $20,201 |
| Q2 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -90,000 | 385,400 | $36,343 |
| Q1 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -50,700 | 475,400 | $40,281 |
| Q4 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -100,600 | 526,100 | $33,144 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -468,807 | 626,700 | $42,866 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -22,193 | 1,095,507 | $57,131 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 115,100 | 1,117,700 | $55,885 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 112,300 | 1,002,600 | $43,713 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 110,800 | 890,300 | $32,051 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 55,300 | 779,500 | $20,696 |
| Q4 2016 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -116,406 | 29,649 | $623 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 10,700 | 724,200 | $15,208 |
| Q3 2016 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -41,425 | 146,055 | $2,534 |
| Q3 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -22,100 | 713,500 | $12,379 |
| Q2 2016 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 187,480 | 187,480 | $2,840 |
| Q2 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 735,600 | 735,600 | $11,144 |
Frequently asked questions about NOVT activity
Which institutional owners are buying NOVT?
Institutional owners buying NOVT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in NOVT activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in NOVT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to NOVT rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in NOVT increasing?
Institutional interest in NOVT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.