PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q3 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Bares Capital Management, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Renaissance Technologies LLC. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) stock institutional ownership
- PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2020 | Bares Capital Management | Buy | 677,306 | 4,716,487 | $477,167 |
| Q1 2020 | Bares Capital Management | Buy | 462,818 | 4,039,181 | $287,711 |
| Q1 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -4,400 | 3,424 | $244 |
| Q4 2019 | Bares Capital Management | Buy | 3,115,000 | 3,576,363 | $284,857 |
| Q3 2019 | Bares Capital Management | Buy | 461,363 | 461,363 | $31,396 |
| Q3 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -142,300 | 7,824 | $532 |
| Q2 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -67,905 | 150,124 | $10,690 |
| Q1 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 175,005 | 218,029 | $14,172 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -30,600 | 43,024 | $2,693 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -85,900 | 73,624 | $4,465 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 79,441 | 159,524 | $7,522 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -34,241 | 80,083 | $4,617 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -21,000 | 114,324 | $6,671 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 96,500 | 135,324 | $5,934 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -269,500 | 38,824 | $1,398 |
| Q3 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -145,400 | 308,324 | $9,092 |
| Q2 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 8,300 | 453,724 | $12,228 |
| Q1 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 156,700 | 445,424 | $11,305 |
| Q4 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 79,200 | 288,724 | $7,940 |
| Q3 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -76,000 | 209,524 | $5,156 |
| Q2 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 110,400 | 285,524 | $6,536 |
| Q1 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 81,700 | 175,124 | $3,809 |
| Q4 2014 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -194,900 | 93,424 | $1,940 |
| Q3 2014 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -145,700 | 288,324 | $5,510 |
| Q2 2014 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 178,159 | 434,024 | $9,167 |
| Q1 2014 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 112,803 | 255,865 | $9,037 |
| Q4 2013 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -12,200 | 143,062 | $7,036 |
| Q3 2013 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -55,900 | 155,262 | $6,181 |
| Q2 2013 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 211,162 | 211,162 | $6,994 |
Frequently asked questions about PEGA activity
Which institutional owners are buying PEGA?
Institutional owners buying PEGA include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in PEGA activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in PEGA compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in PEGA increasing?
Institutional interest in PEGA can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.