RESOLUTE HLDGS MGMT INC (RHLD) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


RESOLUTE HLDGS MGMT INC (RHLD) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Polen Capital Management, and Alta Fox Capital Management. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,00912,700$2,621,661
Q3 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy11,69111,691$843,506
Q3 2025Polen Capital ManagementBuy6,57820,915$1,509,017
Q2 2025Polen Capital ManagementBuy14,33714,337$456,920
Q2 2025Alta Fox Capital ManagementBuy60,100225,249$7,178,686
Q1 2025Alta Fox Capital ManagementBuy165,149165,149$5,175,770

Frequently asked questions about RHLD activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying RHLD?

    Institutional owners buying RHLD include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in RHLD activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in RHLD compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to RESOLUTE HLDGS MGMT INC (RHLD) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in RHLD increasing?

    Institutional interest in RHLD can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.