INVESCO S&P 500 EQUAL WEIGHT (RSPH) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

INVESCO S&P 500 EQUAL WEIGHT (RSPH) institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Sequoia Financial Advisors, Eagle Capital Management, and Matrix Private Capital Group.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2020Matrix Private Capital GroupBuy734,047$899
Q1 2020Eagle Capital ManagementBuy3412,501$473
Q1 2020Matrix Private Capital GroupSell-2253,974$752
Q4 2019Matrix Private Capital GroupBuy4,1994,199$930
Q4 2019Eagle Capital ManagementBuy352,160$478
Q3 2019Eagle Capital ManagementBuy702,125$416
Q2 2019Eagle Capital ManagementBuy502,055$416
Q1 2019Eagle Capital ManagementSell-252,005$396
Q4 2018Eagle Capital ManagementBuy2,0302,030$360

Frequently asked questions about RSPH activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying RSPH?

    Institutional owners buying RSPH include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in RSPH activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in RSPH compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to INVESCO S&P 500 EQUAL WEIGHT (RSPH) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in RSPH increasing?

    Institutional interest in RSPH can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.