SCHP Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

SCHWAB U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC and Sequoia Financial Advisors.

Related SCHP insights

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-228,200153,000$9,575
Q2 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy302,700381,200$23,829
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-90,70078,500$4,801
Q4 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy72,300169,200$10,504
Q2 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy53,90096,900$5,816
Q1 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy30,70043,000$2,365
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-8,00012,300$664
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy20,30020,300$1,114

Frequently asked questions about SCHP activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying SCHP?

    Institutional owners buying SCHP include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in SCHP activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in SCHP compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to SCHWAB U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in SCHP increasing?

    Institutional interest in SCHP can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.