TECK RESOURCES LTD-CLS B (TECK) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

TECK RESOURCES LTD-CLS B (TECK). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, Causeway Capital Management, and Greenlight Capital.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy204,961467,437$2,243
Q2 2015Dodge & Cox Stock FundBuy10,890,94832,962,161$326,655
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy251,915262,476$2,601
Q2 2015Arbiter Partners Capital ManagementBuy200,240200,240$1,984
Q1 2015Dodge & Cox Stock FundBuy22,071,21322,071,213$303,038
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy10,56110,561$200
Q1 2014Third Avenue ManagementBuy360,260360,260$7,788

Frequently asked questions about TECK activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying TECK?

    Institutional owners buying TECK include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in TECK activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in TECK compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to TECK RESOURCES LTD-CLS B (TECK) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in TECK increasing?

    Institutional interest in TECK can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.