(VGR) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to VGR during the quarter ended September 30, 2024 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of VGR during the latest reporting period was Renaissance Technologies LLC, which increased its reported VGR position by approximately $10.95M based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in VGR exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward VGR. InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $13.31M in reported VGR exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in VGR's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy733,9079,043,222$134,924,872
Q2 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy198,8938,309,315$87,829,460
Q1 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy342,6078,110,422$88,890
Q4 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy91,7957,767,815$87,621
Q3 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy384,4667,676,020$81,673
Q1 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy321,7077,364,161$88,444
Q2 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy376,7008,731,963$91,686
Q3 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy140,7479,869,137$95,632
Q1 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy133,90010,226,037$96,329
Q4 2019Matrix Private Capital GroupBuy65,59865,598$878
Q3 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,483,96410,565,437$125,834
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy116,48910,005,893$137,881
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,145,9569,889,404$201,645
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy910,2448,743,448$195,678
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy768,4017,833,204$160,346
Q3 2017Jensen Investment ManagementBuy1,41629,738$609
Q2 2017Jensen Investment ManagementBuy5,51028,322$604
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy942,6837,542,903$156,892
Q1 2017Jensen Investment ManagementBuy2,95022,812$474
Q4 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy131,6176,600,220$150,089
Q3 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy538,4726,468,603$139,269
Q3 2016Jensen Investment ManagementBuy3,22422,569$486
Q2 2016Jensen Investment ManagementBuy2,12019,345$434
Q1 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy460,8656,486,096$148,142
Q1 2016Jensen Investment ManagementBuy84017,225$393
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy240,2006,025,231$142,135
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy228,1985,785,031$130,800
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy223,9005,556,833$130,363
Q2 2015Jensen Investment ManagementBuy22,69022,690$532
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy118,9005,332,933$117,165

Frequently asked questions about VGR activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying VGR?

    Institutional owners buying VGR include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in VGR activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in VGR compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to VGR rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in VGR increasing?

    Institutional interest in VGR can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.