VANGUARD VALUE ETF (VTV) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

VANGUARD VALUE ETF (VTV). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Matrix Advisors Value Fund, Matrix Private Capital Group, and Mairs & Power Growth Fund.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2014Sequoia Financial AdvisorsSell-2003,076$260
Q2 2014Bares Capital ManagementBuy699,231$747
Q1 2014Bares Capital ManagementSell-3229,162$716
Q1 2014Sequoia Financial AdvisorsSell-1543,276$256
Q4 2013Bares Capital ManagementSell-3,8999,484$724
Q4 2013Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy3,4303,430$262
Q3 2013Bares Capital ManagementSell-37113,383$934
Q2 2013Bares Capital ManagementBuy13,75413,754$930

Frequently asked questions about VTV activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying VTV?

    Institutional owners buying VTV include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in VTV activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in VTV compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to VANGUARD VALUE ETF (VTV) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in VTV increasing?

    Institutional interest in VTV can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.