NOVA TIDE FLEXIBL ALOCAT ETF (NMBL) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity
NOVA TIDE FLEXIBL ALOCAT ETF (NMBL). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings (Q4 2025). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions in the latest reporting period. Notable filers include Sbe Llc Dba Cedar Cove Wealth Partners, Glassman Wealth Services, Gts Securities Llc, and Ubs Group Ag.
| Institution | Type | Change in shares | Change Position % | Shares | Reported stock balance | Portfolio quarter | Filing date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gts Securities Llc | Buy | +44,320 | — | 44,320 | $878.29K | Q4 2025 | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Sbe Llc Dba Cedar Cove Wealth Partners | Buy | +113,427 | — | 113,427 | $2.25M | Q4 2025 | Feb 12, 2026 |
| Ubs Group Ag | Buy | +5 | — | 5 | $99.00 | Q4 2025 | Jan 29, 2026 |
| Glassman Wealth Services | Buy | +48,053 | — | 48,053 | $952.25K | Q4 2025 | Jan 28, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about NMBL activity
Which institutional owners are buying NMBL?
Institutional owners buying NMBL include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in NMBL activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in NMBL compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to NOVA TIDE FLEXIBL ALOCAT ETF (NMBL) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in NMBL increasing?
Institutional interest in NMBL can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.