CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP (CFG) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP (CFG) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Causeway Capital Management, Olstein Capital Management, Appaloosa Management, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Renaissance Technologies LLC. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP (CFG) stock institutional ownership
- CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP (CFG) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2019 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -6,525 | 325,500 | $10,579 |
| Q4 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 68,625 | 332,025 | $9,871 |
| Q4 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 497,900 | 1,432,400 | $42,585 |
| Q3 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 6,400 | 263,400 | $10,159 |
| Q2 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -709,807 | 25,992 | $1,011 |
| Q2 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 58,400 | 257,000 | $9,997 |
| Q2 2018 | Appaloosa Management | Sell | -1,572,056 | 1,257,694 | $48,924 |
| Q1 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -239 | 735,799 | $30,889 |
| Q1 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -87,580 | 198,600 | $8,337 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -843,500 | 934,500 | $39,230 |
| Q4 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -824,404 | 736,038 | $30,899 |
| Q4 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -44,850 | 286,180 | $12,014 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -144,600 | 1,778,000 | $74,640 |
| Q3 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 12,100 | 331,030 | $12,536 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 1,311,000 | 1,922,600 | $72,809 |
| Q2 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -205,341 | 1,560,442 | $55,677 |
| Q2 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 31,885 | 318,930 | $11,379 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -840,200 | 611,600 | $21,822 |
| Q1 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -288 | 1,765,783 | $61,008 |
| Q1 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -31,925 | 287,045 | $9,917 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 1,045,800 | 1,451,800 | $50,160 |
| Q4 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -325,975 | 1,766,071 | $62,925 |
| Q4 2016 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -282,570 | 318,970 | $11,365 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 375,800 | 406,000 | $14,466 |
| Q4 2016 | Appaloosa Management | Buy | 249,613 | 2,829,750 | $100,824 |
| Q3 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -3,625 | 2,092,046 | $51,694 |
| Q3 2016 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 35,250 | 601,540 | $14,864 |
| Q3 2016 | Appaloosa Management | Buy | 2,580,137 | 2,580,137 | $63,755 |
| Q2 2016 | Sound Shore Management | Sell | -3,792,846 | 2,686,752 | $53,681 |
| Q2 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 4,625 | 2,095,671 | $41,872 |
Frequently asked questions about CFG activity
Which institutional owners are buying CFG?
Institutional owners buying CFG include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in CFG activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CFG compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP (CFG) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in CFG increasing?
Institutional interest in CFG can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.