COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A (CTSH) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A (CTSH) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Yacktman Asset Management, Causeway Capital Management, Hancock Classic Value, Jensen Investment Management, and Renaissance Technologies LLC. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A (CTSH) stock institutional ownership
- COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A (CTSH) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2018 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Buy | 3,259 | 94,534 | $7,610 |
| Q1 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -427,650 | 6,691,984 | $538,705 |
| Q1 2018 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Sell | -4,000 | 400,000 | $32,200 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -98,500 | 453,252 | $32,190 |
| Q4 2017 | AKO Capital | Sell | -56,035 | 763,152 | $54,199 |
| Q4 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Buy | 527,239 | 2,933,285 | $208,322 |
| Q4 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -35,459 | 1,304,510 | $92,646 |
| Q4 2017 | Wedgewood Partners | Sell | -267,276 | 1,105,870 | $78,537 |
| Q4 2017 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Sell | -945 | 91,275 | $6,482 |
| Q4 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 194,583 | 7,119,634 | $505,636 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -14,000 | 551,752 | $40,024 |
| Q3 2017 | AKO Capital | Buy | 105,850 | 819,187 | $59,424 |
| Q3 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -4,292 | 1,339,969 | $97,201 |
| Q3 2017 | Wedgewood Partners | Sell | -316,200 | 1,373,146 | $99,607 |
| Q3 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -13,260 | 2,406,046 | $174,535 |
| Q3 2017 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Buy | 92,220 | 92,220 | $6,690 |
| Q3 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -85,829 | 6,925,051 | $502,343 |
| Q2 2017 | AKO Capital | Buy | 169,280 | 713,337 | $47,366 |
| Q2 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Buy | 1,344,261 | 1,344,261 | $89,259 |
| Q2 2017 | Wedgewood Partners | Sell | -630,915 | 1,689,346 | $112,172 |
| Q2 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -67,585 | 2,419,306 | $160,642 |
| Q2 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 296,899 | 7,010,880 | $465,522 |
| Q2 2017 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Buy | 3,000 | 404,000 | $26,826 |
| Q1 2017 | AKO Capital | Sell | -65,631 | 544,057 | $32,382 |
| Q1 2017 | Wedgewood Partners | Sell | -206,477 | 2,320,261 | $138,100 |
| Q1 2017 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Buy | 401,000 | 401,000 | $23,868 |
| Q1 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -5,675 | 2,486,891 | $148,020 |
| Q1 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 1,981,287 | 6,713,981 | $399,616 |
| Q4 2016 | AKO Capital | Buy | 609,688 | 609,688 | $34,161 |
| Q4 2016 | Wedgewood Partners | Sell | -2,849,402 | 2,526,738 | $141,571 |
Frequently asked questions about CTSH activity
Which institutional owners are buying CTSH?
Institutional owners buying CTSH include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in CTSH activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CTSH compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to COGNIZANT TECH SOLUTIONS-A (CTSH) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in CTSH increasing?
Institutional interest in CTSH can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.