ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN ETF (EWT) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN ETF (EWT) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Causeway Capital Management, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Hancock Classic Value. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2018Hancock Classic ValueBuy125,790125,790$4,528
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy44,70051,200$1,854
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-23,4006,500$235
Q2 2017Causeway Capital ManagementBuy9,40059,200$2,117
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy29,90029,900$994
Q1 2017Causeway Capital ManagementBuy8,20049,800$1,655
Q4 2016Causeway Capital ManagementBuy41,60041,600$1,222

Frequently asked questions about EWT activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying EWT?

    Institutional owners buying EWT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in EWT activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in EWT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN ETF (EWT) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in EWT increasing?

    Institutional interest in EWT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.