ISHARES CORE S&P MIDCAP ETF (IJH) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
ISHARES CORE S&P MIDCAP ETF (IJH) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Matrix Private Capital Group, Matrix Advisors Value Fund, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Mairs & Power Growth Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- ISHARES CORE S&P MIDCAP ETF (IJH) stock institutional ownership
- ISHARES CORE S&P MIDCAP ETF (IJH) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 10,000 | 14,500 | $2,578 |
| Q2 2020 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -16,905 | 0 | $3,026 |
| Q1 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 2,300 | 4,500 | $647 |
| Q1 2020 | Matrix Private Capital Group | Buy | 5,864 | 12,677 | $1,824 |
| Q1 2020 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 867 | 16,905 | $2,432 |
| Q4 2019 | Matrix Private Capital Group | Buy | 6,813 | 6,813 | $1,402 |
| Q4 2019 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 2,090 | 16,038 | $3,301 |
| Q3 2019 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -225 | 1,880 | $363 |
| Q3 2019 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -1,026 | 13,948 | $2,695 |
| Q2 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -4,500 | 2,200 | $427 |
| Q2 2019 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 1,910 | 14,974 | $2,909 |
| Q1 2019 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 1,111 | 13,064 | $2,474 |
| Q4 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 123 | 11,953 | $1,985 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 6,700 | 6,700 | $1,349 |
| Q3 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -75 | 11,830 | $2,381 |
| Q2 2018 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -25 | 2,105 | $410 |
| Q2 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -60 | 11,905 | $2,319 |
| Q1 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 612 | 11,965 | $2,244 |
| Q4 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 136 | 11,353 | $2,155 |
| Q3 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -395 | 11,217 | $2,007 |
| Q2 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -431 | 2,130 | $371 |
| Q2 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 846 | 11,612 | $2,020 |
| Q1 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 136 | 2,561 | $438 |
| Q1 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -317 | 10,766 | $1,843 |
| Q4 2016 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -130 | 2,425 | $401 |
| Q4 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 1,173 | 11,083 | $1,832 |
| Q3 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -2,454 | 9,910 | $1,533 |
| Q2 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 10,480 | 12,364 | $1,847 |
| Q1 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -2,804 | 1,884 | $13,066 |
| Q4 2015 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -102 | 4,688 | $679 |
Frequently asked questions about IJH activity
Which institutional owners are buying IJH?
Institutional owners buying IJH include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in IJH activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in IJH compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ISHARES CORE S&P MIDCAP ETF (IJH) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in IJH increasing?
Institutional interest in IJH can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.