LEAR CORP (LEA) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
LEAR CORP (LEA) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Hancock Classic Value, Greenhaven Associates, Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Chou Associates Management. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- LEAR CORP (LEA) stock institutional ownership
- LEAR CORP (LEA) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2020 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -268,957 | 4,607,440 | $732,721 |
| Q4 2020 | Greenhaven Associates | Sell | -1,700 | 513,221 | $81,618 |
| Q3 2020 | Oaktree Capital Management | Sell | -1,814 | 13,498 | $1,472 |
| Q3 2020 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -86,010 | 4,876,397 | $531,771 |
| Q3 2020 | Greenhaven Associates | Buy | 223,710 | 514,921 | $56,152 |
| Q2 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -6,500 | 2,900 | $316 |
| Q2 2020 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -283,395 | 4,962,407 | $541,002 |
| Q2 2020 | Greenhaven Associates | Buy | 291,211 | 291,211 | $31,748 |
| Q1 2020 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -81,100 | 9,400 | $764 |
| Q1 2020 | Atlantic Investment Management | Buy | 22,030 | 259,030 | $21,046 |
| Q1 2020 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 692,494 | 5,245,802 | $426,221 |
| Q4 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -35,100 | 90,500 | $12,417 |
| Q4 2019 | Atlantic Investment Management | Buy | 230,000 | 237,000 | $32,516 |
| Q4 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 361,827 | 4,553,308 | $624,714 |
| Q3 2019 | Atlantic Investment Management | Sell | -4,162 | 7,000 | $825 |
| Q3 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 85,800 | 125,600 | $14,808 |
| Q3 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 357,178 | 4,191,481 | $494,176 |
| Q2 2019 | Atlantic Investment Management | Buy | 4,026 | 11,162 | $1,555 |
| Q2 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -97,300 | 39,800 | $5,543 |
| Q2 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 1,223,567 | 3,834,303 | $534,003 |
| Q1 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -94,400 | 137,100 | $18,606 |
| Q1 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -155,514 | 2,610,736 | $354,303 |
| Q1 2019 | Atlantic Investment Management | Buy | 2,933 | 7,136 | $968,427 |
| Q4 2018 | Atlantic Investment Management | Sell | -20,797 | 4,203 | $516 |
| Q4 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -274,500 | 231,500 | $28,442 |
| Q4 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 2,766,250 | 2,766,250 | $339,861 |
| Q3 2018 | Atlantic Investment Management | Sell | -50,132 | 25,000 | $3,625 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 451,300 | 506,000 | $73,370 |
| Q1 2018 | Oaktree Capital Management | Buy | 15,312 | 15,312 | $2,841 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -24,500 | 54,700 | $10,179 |
Frequently asked questions about LEA activity
Which institutional owners are buying LEA?
Institutional owners buying LEA include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in LEA activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LEA compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to LEAR CORP (LEA) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in LEA increasing?
Institutional interest in LEA can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.