Linde plc (LIN) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

Linde plc (LIN). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Egerton Capital UK, Renaissance Technologies LLC, AKO Capital, Parnassus Endeavor Fund, and Dodge & Cox Stock Fund.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2023Parnassus Endeavor FundBuy2,833,9212,833,921$1,007,288,880
Q1 2023Dodge & Cox Stock FundBuy1,355,1901,355,190$481,688,734
Q1 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy666,600666,600$236,936
Q1 2023Egerton Capital UKBuy119,255119,255$42,387,997
Q1 2023First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy6,8536,853$2,435,830
Q1 2023Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy5,2925,292$1,881,038
Q1 2023Jensen Investment ManagementBuy2,7152,715$949,960
Q1 2023Matrix Private Capital GroupBuy1,3621,362$484,109

Frequently asked questions about LIN activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying LIN?

    Institutional owners buying LIN include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in LIN activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LIN compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to Linde plc (LIN) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in LIN increasing?

    Institutional interest in LIN can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.