MAXIMUS INC (MMS) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


MAXIMUS INC (MMS) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Jensen Investment Management, and Hancock Classic Value. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-211,9002,276,500$91,356
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-154,3562,488,400$107,051
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy176,9562,642,756$118,554
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy341,4002,465,800$108,471
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,116,5002,124,400$95,683
Q2 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,007,9001,007,900$75,068

Frequently asked questions about MMS activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying MMS?

    Institutional owners buying MMS include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in MMS activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in MMS compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to MAXIMUS INC (MMS) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in MMS increasing?

    Institutional interest in MMS can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.