NATURAL GAS SERVICES GROUP (NGS) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to NATURAL GAS SERVICES GROUP (NGS) during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of NGS during the latest reporting period was First Eagle U.S. Value, which increased its reported NGS position by approximately $3.35M based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in NGS exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward NATURAL GAS SERVICES GROUP (NGS). InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $7.20M in reported NGS exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in NATURAL GAS SERVICES GROUP's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2025First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy500299,739$8,389,695
Q2 2025First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy15,550299,239$7,723,359
Q1 2025First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy54,395283,689$6,232,647
Q4 2024First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy124,978229,294$6,145,079
Q3 2024First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy83,026104,316$1,993,479
Q2 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy19,543399,342$8,034,761
Q4 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy2,853482,343$7,756
Q2 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy47,243521,142$5,159
Q4 2022First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy21,29021,290$243,983
Q4 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy18,932521,142$5,972
Q2 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy12,081524,442$5,769
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy21,155686,261$6,478
Q1 2020Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy84,662778,268$3,471
Q4 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy38,200693,606$8,504
Q3 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy118,401655,406$8,396
Q2 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy54,000537,005$8,861
Q1 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy35,400483,005$8,361
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy74,411458,400$9,672
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy9,500390,200$10,223
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy27,600380,700$10,812
Q2 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy38,700353,100$8,775
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy49,900314,400$8,190
Q4 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy4,900264,500$8,504
Q3 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy20,100259,600$6,384
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy2,500254,600$5,678
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy6,137305,130$5,865
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy57,700349,800$8,420
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy14,300292,100$9,657
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy30,100277,800$8,373
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy22,200247,700$6,829

Frequently asked questions about NGS activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying NGS?

    Institutional owners buying NGS include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in NGS activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in NGS compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to NATURAL GAS SERVICES GROUP (NGS) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in NGS increasing?

    Institutional interest in NGS can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.