RELX Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity


RELX PLC - SPON ADR (RELX) institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, pension funds, and institutional investors holding Amazon shares based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026). Recent filings show notable position changes from firms including First Eagle U.S. Value, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Parnassus Endeavor Fund, Causeway Capital Management, and Renaissance Technologies LLC. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, increased and reduced positions, new holdings, and sold-out positions to help investors understand institutional sentiment, portfolio allocation trends, and hedge fund conviction in RELX PLC - SPON ADR stock.


Key Insights:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy22,000113,900$2,140
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy6,40091,900$1,639
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy85,50085,500$1,487

Frequently asked questions about RELX activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying RELX?

    Institutional owners buying RELX include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in RELX activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in RELX compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to RELX PLC - SPON ADR (RELX) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in RELX increasing?

    Institutional interest in RELX can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.