RITHM CAPITAL CORP (RITM) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

RITHM CAPITAL CORP (RITM). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Sequoia Financial Advisors, Renaissance Technologies LLC, Arbiter Partners Capital Management, and Miller Value Partners.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-1,062,600166,205$2,021
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-521,3141,228,805$16,097
Q3 2015Miller Value PartnersBuy30,000173,750$2,277
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,480,9141,750,119$26,672
Q1 2015Miller Value PartnersBuy100,000143,750$2,161
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-50,300269,205$4,046
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy319,505319,505$4,080
Q4 2014Miller Value PartnersBuy43,75043,750$559

Frequently asked questions about RITM activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying RITM?

    Institutional owners buying RITM include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in RITM activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in RITM compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to RITHM CAPITAL CORP (RITM) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in RITM increasing?

    Institutional interest in RITM can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.