RESMED INC (RMD) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
RESMED INC (RMD) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Giverny Capital, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Jensen Investment Management, and AKO Capital. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- RESMED INC (RMD) stock institutional ownership
- RESMED INC (RMD) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2013 | Tiger Global Management | Buy | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 | $47,080 |
| Q3 2013 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 692,100 | 692,100 | $36,557 |
| Q2 2013 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Buy | 22,000 | 22,000 | $993 |
Frequently asked questions about RMD activity
Which institutional owners are buying RMD?
Institutional owners buying RMD include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in RMD activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in RMD compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to RESMED INC (RMD) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in RMD increasing?
Institutional interest in RMD can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.