SAP SE-SPONSORED ADR (SAP) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
SAP SE-SPONSORED ADR (SAP) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Eagle Capital Management, Polen Capital Management, Causeway Capital Management, Sequoia Fund, and Sequoia Financial Advisors. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- SAP SE-SPONSORED ADR (SAP) stock institutional ownership
- SAP SE-SPONSORED ADR (SAP) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2018 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 27,798 | 189,562 | $19,934 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 184,800 | 520,300 | $54,715 |
| Q4 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -52 | 3,796 | $427 |
| Q4 2017 | Polen Capital Management | Buy | 16,672 | 37,885 | $4,257 |
| Q4 2017 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 8,422 | 161,764 | $18,176 |
| Q3 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 80 | 3,848 | $422 |
| Q3 2017 | Polen Capital Management | Buy | 16,063 | 21,213 | $2,326 |
| Q3 2017 | Causeway Capital Management | Sell | -2,954 | 153,342 | $16,814 |
| Q2 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -459 | 3,768 | $394 |
| Q2 2017 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 7,089 | 156,296 | $16,360 |
| Q1 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 457 | 4,227 | $415 |
| Q1 2017 | Causeway Capital Management | Sell | -8,342 | 149,207 | $14,648 |
| Q4 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -70 | 3,770 | $326 |
| Q4 2016 | Causeway Capital Management | Sell | -9,090 | 157,549 | $13,268 |
| Q3 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 87 | 3,840 | $351 |
| Q3 2016 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 1,720 | 166,639 | $15,232 |
| Q2 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 3,450 | 3,753 | $282 |
| Q2 2016 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 1,387 | 164,919 | $12,372 |
| Q2 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 165,600 | 335,500 | $25,169 |
| Q1 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -4,834 | 303 | $3,766 |
| Q1 2016 | Causeway Capital Management | Sell | -32,060 | 163,532 | $12,857 |
| Q1 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -84,210 | 169,900 | $13,663 |
| Q4 2015 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 972 | 5,137 | $358 |
| Q4 2015 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 3,967 | 195,592 | $15,471 |
| Q3 2015 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -309 | 4,165 | $270 |
| Q3 2015 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 19,631 | 191,625 | $12,415 |
| Q2 2015 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 4 | 4,474 | $314 |
| Q2 2015 | Causeway Capital Management | Buy | 20,527 | 171,994 | $12,079 |
| Q1 2015 | Causeway Capital Management | Sell | -11,614 | 151,467 | $10,931 |
| Q1 2015 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -667 | 4,470 | $323 |
Frequently asked questions about SAP activity
Which institutional owners are buying SAP?
Institutional owners buying SAP include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in SAP activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in SAP compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to SAP SE-SPONSORED ADR (SAP) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in SAP increasing?
Institutional interest in SAP can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.