WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Scion Asset Management, and Jensen Investment Management. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy94,820849,920$14,202
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy84,000755,100$16,340
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy523,400671,100$19,113
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy119,900147,700$4,941
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-79,60027,800$819
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy107,400107,400$3,647

Frequently asked questions about WWW activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying WWW?

    Institutional owners buying WWW include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in WWW activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in WWW compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in WWW increasing?

    Institutional interest in WWW can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.