CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY (CRS) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY (CRS) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Lone Pine Capital, Third Point, Renaissance Technologies LLC, Polen Capital Management, and Egerton Capital UK. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2016ARK InvestBuy552552$20
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-65,10052,400$1,560
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-274,600117,500$5,787
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy323,400392,100$17,703
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-46,40068,700$4,273
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy115,100115,100$6,688

Frequently asked questions about CRS activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying CRS?

    Institutional owners buying CRS include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in CRS activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CRS compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY (CRS) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in CRS increasing?

    Institutional interest in CRS can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.