CARVANA CO (CVNA) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

CARVANA CO (CVNA). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings. This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions among tracked filers. Notable filers include Viking Global Investors, Renaissance Technologies LLC, RV Capital, Durable Capital Partners, and CAS Investment Partners.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q4 2018ShawSpring PartnersBuy695,861695,861$22,762
Q4 2018Oakcliff Capital PartnersBuy135,000239,020$7,818
Q4 2018CAS Investment PartnersBuy111,6072,167,766$70,908
Q3 2018Oakcliff Capital PartnersBuy104,020104,020$6,147
Q3 2018Miller Value PartnersSell-26,0004,000$236
Q2 2018CAS Investment PartnersBuy48,0912,056,159$92,877
Q1 2018CAS Investment PartnersBuy2,008,0682,008,068$46,045
Q1 2018Punch Card ManagementBuy75,11275,112$1,722
Q2 2017Miller Value PartnersBuy30,00030,000$614

Frequently asked questions about CVNA activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying CVNA?

    Institutional owners buying CVNA include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in CVNA activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in CVNA compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CARVANA CO (CVNA) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in CVNA increasing?

    Institutional interest in CVNA can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.