(IONQ) Stock Institutional Trading Activity


(IONQ) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q3 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.

Explore more:

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q3 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy4,073,3005,079,700$312,401,550
Q2 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-1,809,4001,006,400$43,245,008
Q1 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,918,5972,815,800$62,144,706
Q4 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-2,459,197897,203$11,116
Q3 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,224,5003,356,400$49,943
Q2 2023Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy1,986,9002,131,900$28,845
Q4 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy145,000145,000$2,422

Frequently asked questions about IONQ activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying IONQ?

    Institutional owners buying IONQ include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in IONQ activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in IONQ compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to IONQ rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in IONQ increasing?

    Institutional interest in IONQ can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.