LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Berkshire Hathaway, Egerton Capital UK, Sequoia Financial Advisors, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Gardner Russo & Quinn. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) stock institutional ownership
- LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -91,100 | 1,961,800 | $160,730 |
| Q2 2019 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -368 | 8,388 | $677 |
| Q2 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -258 | 10,750 | $868 |
| Q2 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -152,912 | 2,052,900 | $165,690 |
| Q1 2019 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 2,358 | 11,008 | $872 |
| Q1 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 71,200 | 2,205,812 | $174,833 |
| Q4 2018 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -2,689 | 8,756 | $606 |
| Q4 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 245,012 | 2,134,612 | $147,672 |
| Q3 2018 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -500 | 11,445 | $890 |
| Q3 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -1,411 | 8,650 | $673 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 427,588 | 1,889,600 | $147,011 |
| Q2 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -107,920 | 10,061 | $687 |
| Q1 2018 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -225 | 11,945 | $760 |
| Q1 2018 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -1,463,893 | 117,981 | $7,511 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 393,800 | 1,462,012 | $93,072 |
| Q4 2017 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -320 | 12,170 | $904 |
| Q4 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -8,562 | 1,581,874 | $117,438 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 420,412 | 1,068,212 | $79,304 |
| Q3 2017 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -750 | 12,490 | $856 |
| Q3 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -1,989 | 1,590,436 | $108,993 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 256,000 | 647,800 | $44,394 |
| Q2 2017 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -260 | 13,240 | $974 |
| Q2 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -161,697 | 1,592,425 | $117,155 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 280,388 | 391,800 | $28,825 |
| Q1 2017 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -475 | 13,500 | $1,009 |
| Q1 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -12,221 | 1,754,122 | $131,103 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 60,400 | 111,412 | $8,327 |
| Q4 2016 | Akre Capital Management | Sell | -767 | 48,530 | $3,263 |
| Q4 2016 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -10 | 13,975 | $940 |
| Q4 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -11,584 | 1,766,343 | $118,769 |
Frequently asked questions about LAMR activity
Which institutional owners are buying LAMR?
Institutional owners buying LAMR include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in LAMR activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LAMR compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in LAMR increasing?
Institutional interest in LAMR can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.