LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of LAMR during the latest reporting period was Berkshire Hathaway, which increased its reported LAMR position by approximately $141.93M based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in LAMR exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR). InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $292.39M in reported LAMR exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2026Egerton Capital UKBuy1,8751,090,619$170,114,752
Q2 2026Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy3611,950$304,161
Q1 2026Egerton Capital UKBuy366,6611,088,744$137,900,315
Q1 2026Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy39,70098,212$12,439,532
Q4 2025Berkshire HathawayBuy3001,202,410$152,201,058
Q3 2025Egerton Capital UKBuy723,857723,857$88,614,574
Q3 2025Berkshire HathawayBuy32,6031,202,110$147,162,306
Q3 2025Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy2,1052,105$257,694
Q2 2025Berkshire HathawayBuy1,169,5071,169,507$141,931,370
Q1 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy5,20058,512$6,657,495
Q4 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy38,91253,312$6,490,203
Q4 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy35,40068,012$6,420
Q2 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy79,700159,912$14,067
Q3 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy105,300119,412$13,547
Q1 2021Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,60084,912$7,975
Q4 2019Hancock Classic ValueBuy1,30210,754$960
Q1 2019Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy71,2002,205,812$174,833
Q1 2019Hancock Classic ValueBuy2,35811,008$872
Q4 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy245,0122,134,612$147,672
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy427,5881,889,600$147,011
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy393,8001,462,012$93,072
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy420,4121,068,212$79,304
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy256,000647,800$44,394
Q2 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy280,388391,800$28,825
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy60,400111,412$8,327
Q4 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy21251,012$3,430
Q1 2016Greenlight CapitalBuy148,072148,072$9,107
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy57,288260,700$15,452
Q1 2015Gardner Russo & QuinnBuy2,90017,760$1,053
Q4 2014Hancock Classic ValueBuy3,415,8383,415,838$183,226

Frequently asked questions about LAMR activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying LAMR?

    Institutional owners buying LAMR include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in LAMR activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LAMR compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to LAMAR ADVERTISING CO-A (LAMR) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in LAMR increasing?

    Institutional interest in LAMR can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.