SIMULATIONS PLUS INC (SLP) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to SIMULATIONS PLUS INC (SLP) during the quarter ended March 31, 2026 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of SLP during the latest reporting period was First Eagle U.S. Value, which increased its reported SLP position by approximately $7.92M based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in SLP exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward SIMULATIONS PLUS INC (SLP). InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $15.06M in reported SLP exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in SIMULATIONS PLUS INC's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q1 2026First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy284,914742,069$8,771,256
Q1 2026Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy161,500181,500$2,145,330
Q4 2025First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy434,275457,155$8,333,935
Q3 2025First Eagle U.S. ValueBuy22,88022,880$344,802
Q4 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy14,20045,100$1,257,839
Q3 2024Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy19,40030,900$989,418
Q2 2024Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy10,06410,064$489,312
Q4 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy30,20059,900$2,191
Q3 2022Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy23,50029,700$1,442
Q3 2021Polen Capital ManagementBuy15,252178,076$7,034
Q2 2021Polen Capital ManagementBuy32,066162,824$8,941
Q1 2021Polen Capital ManagementBuy41,329130,758$8,269
Q4 2020Polen Capital ManagementBuy89,42989,429$6,432
Q4 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,900616,300$12,264
Q3 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy50,900607,400$12,269
Q1 2018Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy31,400556,500$8,208
Q4 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy14,100525,100$8,454
Q3 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy32,853511,000$7,921
Q1 2017Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy33,700515,000$6,051
Q2 2016Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,142532,200$4,023
Q4 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy64,364526,000$5,213
Q3 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy11,036461,636$4,358
Q2 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy8,100450,600$2,825
Q1 2015Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy17,394442,500$2,717
Q4 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy26,906425,106$2,840
Q3 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy21,400398,200$2,767
Q2 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy24,100376,800$2,118
Q1 2014Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy15,500352,700$2,349
Q4 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy31,000337,200$1,703
Q3 2013Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy25,100306,200$1,473

Frequently asked questions about SLP activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying SLP?

    Institutional owners buying SLP include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in SLP activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in SLP compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to SIMULATIONS PLUS INC (SLP) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in SLP increasing?

    Institutional interest in SLP can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.