CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC-A (STZ) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC-A (STZ) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Hancock Classic Value, Berkshire Hathaway, Renaissance Technologies LLC, Olstein Capital Management, and Matrix Advisors Value Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC-A (STZ) stock institutional ownership
- CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC-A (STZ) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2016 | Eagle Capital Management | Sell | -3,461 | 13,994 | $2,145 |
| Q3 2016 | Eagle Capital Management | Sell | -482 | 5,327 | $887 |
| Q3 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -234,700 | 213,900 | $35,612 |
| Q3 2016 | Third Point | Buy | 200,000 | 2,200,000 | $366,278 |
| Q3 2016 | Egerton Capital UK | Buy | 399,874 | 2,247,175 | $374,132 |
| Q3 2016 | Viking Global Investors | Buy | 2,210,077 | 2,675,260 | $445,404 |
| Q3 2016 | Lone Pine Capital | Sell | -1,099,320 | 5,566,692 | $926,799 |
| Q3 2016 | Eagle Capital Management | Buy | 17,455 | 17,455 | $2,906 |
| Q2 2016 | Eagle Capital Management | Sell | -214,225 | 5,809 | $961 |
| Q2 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 313,600 | 448,600 | $74,198 |
| Q2 2016 | Viking Global Investors | Sell | -361,525 | 465,183 | $76,941 |
| Q2 2016 | Egerton Capital UK | Buy | 1,847,301 | 1,847,301 | $305,544 |
| Q2 2016 | Third Point | Buy | 235,000 | 2,000,000 | $330,800 |
| Q2 2016 | Lone Pine Capital | Buy | 769,791 | 6,666,012 | $1,102,558 |
| Q1 2016 | Eagle Capital Management | Sell | -1,385,540 | 220,034 | $33,245 |
| Q1 2016 | Viking Global Investors | Sell | -2,482,124 | 826,708 | $124,907 |
| Q1 2016 | Third Point | Buy | 165,000 | 1,765,000 | $266,674 |
| Q1 2016 | Lone Pine Capital | Buy | 545,228 | 5,896,221 | $890,860 |
| Q4 2015 | Eagle Capital Management | Sell | -1,149,280 | 1,605,574 | $228,698 |
| Q4 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -160,184 | 135,000 | $19,229 |
| Q4 2015 | Third Point | Sell | -150,000 | 1,600,000 | $227,904 |
| Q4 2015 | Lone Pine Capital | Buy | 666,779 | 5,350,993 | $762,195 |
| Q3 2015 | Eagle Capital Management | Buy | 2,754,854 | 2,754,854 | $344,935 |
| Q3 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -90,316 | 295,184 | $36,960 |
| Q3 2015 | Third Point | Sell | -150,000 | 1,750,000 | $219,118 |
| Q3 2015 | Lone Pine Capital | Buy | 4,684,214 | 4,684,214 | $586,510 |
| Q2 2015 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 85,800 | 385,500 | $44,726 |
| Q2 2015 | Third Point | Sell | -100,000 | 1,900,000 | $220,438 |
| Q4 2014 | Third Point | Sell | -100,000 | 2,000,000 | $196,340 |
| Q3 2014 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -266,300 | 299,700 | $26,122 |
Frequently asked questions about STZ activity
Which institutional owners are buying STZ?
Institutional owners buying STZ include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in STZ activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in STZ compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to CONSTELLATION BRANDS INC-A (STZ) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in STZ increasing?
Institutional interest in STZ can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.