ZIMVIE INC (ZIMV) Institutional Ownership Changes & 13F Activity

ZIMVIE INC (ZIMV). Institutional ownership data tracks hedge funds, asset managers, and other institutional investors based on recent SEC Form 13F filings (Q3 2025). This page analyzes institutional buying and selling activity, new holdings, and sold-out positions in the latest reporting period. Notable filers include Neuberger Berman Group Llc, Renaissance Technologies LLC, First Eagle U.S. Value, Ariel Appreciation Fund, and Advisors Asset Management, Inc..

InstitutionTypeChange in sharesChange Position %SharesReported stock balancePortfolio quarterFiling date
Neuberger Berman Group LlcSell-614,093-47.0%691,669$13.10MQ3 2025Oct 27, 2026
Advisors Asset Management, Inc.Sell-2-1.2%169$3.20KQ3 2025Aug 26, 2026
Renaissance Technologies LLCSell-316,000-75.5%102,500$1.94MQ3 2025Nov 13, 2025
First Eagle U.S. ValueSell-216,691-50.4%213,182$4.04MQ3 2025Nov 12, 2025
Ariel Appreciation FundSell-206,401-100.0%0$0.00Q3 2025Aug 14, 2025
Showing 5 of 5

Frequently asked questions about ZIMV activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying ZIMV?

    Institutional owners buying ZIMV include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in ZIMV activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in ZIMV compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ZIMVIE INC (ZIMV) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in ZIMV increasing?

    Institutional interest in ZIMV can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.