MEDTRONIC PLC (MDT) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
MEDTRONIC PLC (MDT) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Hancock Classic Value, Polen Capital Management, Mairs & Power Growth Fund, Olstein Capital Management, and Cullen Value Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- MEDTRONIC PLC (MDT) stock institutional ownership
- MEDTRONIC PLC (MDT) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -80 | 5,674 | $486 |
| Q2 2018 | Polen Capital Management | Buy | 4,452 | 55,279 | $4,732 |
| Q2 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -30,000 | 86,000 | $7,362 |
| Q1 2018 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 27,872 | 3,668,495 | $294,287 |
| Q1 2018 | Polen Capital Management | Buy | 28,460 | 50,827 | $4,077 |
| Q1 2018 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Buy | 436,874 | 18,721,632 | $1,501,849 |
| Q1 2018 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -812 | 5,754 | $462 |
| Q1 2018 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -1,000 | 116,000 | $9,306 |
| Q4 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 86,568 | 3,640,623 | $293,980 |
| Q4 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Buy | 6,137,663 | 18,284,758 | $1,476,494 |
| Q4 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 1,120 | 6,566 | $530 |
| Q4 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -228 | 6,790 | $548 |
| Q4 2017 | Polen Capital Management | Buy | 22,367 | 22,367 | $1,806 |
| Q4 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 6,000 | 117,000 | $9,448 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -4,965,072 | 1,432,441 | $115,670 |
| Q3 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 68,629 | 3,554,055 | $276,399 |
| Q3 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -1,340 | 7,018 | $546 |
| Q3 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Buy | 563,224 | 12,147,095 | $944,680 |
| Q3 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 951 | 5,446 | $424 |
| Q3 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Buy | 19,850 | 111,000 | $8,632 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 5,963,513 | 6,397,513 | $497,535 |
| Q2 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 11,520 | 3,485,426 | $309,332 |
| Q2 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -600 | 8,358 | $742 |
| Q2 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -628,405 | 11,583,871 | $1,028,069 |
| Q2 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Sell | -172 | 4,495 | $399 |
| Q2 2017 | Olstein Capital Management | Sell | -29,850 | 91,150 | $8,090 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -444,141 | 434,000 | $38,518 |
| Q1 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 331,827 | 3,473,906 | $279,858 |
| Q1 2017 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -2,500 | 8,958 | $722 |
| Q1 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Buy | 1,517,151 | 12,212,276 | $983,821 |
Frequently asked questions about MDT activity
Which institutional owners are buying MDT?
Institutional owners buying MDT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in MDT activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in MDT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to MEDTRONIC PLC (MDT) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in MDT increasing?
Institutional interest in MDT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.