SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Disciplined Growth Investors, Torray Fund, Renaissance Technologies LLC, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Sequoia Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC) stock institutional ownership
- SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2019 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 36,852 | 479,130 | $50,817 |
| Q1 2019 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Buy | 1,313 | 143,151 | $15,183 |
| Q4 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 190,745 | 442,278 | $36,435 |
| Q4 2018 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -895 | 141,838 | $11,685 |
| Q3 2018 | Sequoia Fund | Sell | -130,000 | 35,000 | $3,473 |
| Q3 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 106,133 | 251,533 | $24,962 |
| Q3 2018 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -2,187 | 142,733 | $14,165 |
| Q2 2018 | Sequoia Fund | Sell | -130,000 | 165,000 | $12,124 |
| Q2 2018 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -225 | 144,920 | $10,649 |
| Q1 2018 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -10,300 | 16,570 | $1,062 |
| Q1 2018 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -139,000 | 145,400 | $9,316 |
| Q1 2018 | Sequoia Fund | Buy | 295,000 | 295,000 | $18,322 |
| Q1 2018 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -361 | 145,145 | $9,299 |
| Q4 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -32,000 | 26,870 | $1,306 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 162,100 | 284,400 | $13,819 |
| Q4 2017 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Buy | 3,431 | 145,506 | $7,070 |
| Q3 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -100 | 58,870 | $3,339 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 100,700 | 122,300 | $6,936 |
| Q3 2017 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -6,650 | 142,075 | $8,057 |
| Q2 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 140 | 58,970 | $3,760 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -29,300 | 21,600 | $1,377 |
| Q2 2017 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Buy | 450 | 148,725 | $9,483 |
| Q1 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 15,550 | 58,830 | $3,441 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -7,400 | 50,900 | $2,977 |
| Q1 2017 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Sell | -1,075 | 148,275 | $8,673 |
| Q4 2016 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -170 | 43,280 | $3,025 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -43,900 | 58,300 | $4,075 |
| Q4 2016 | Disciplined Growth Investors | Buy | 11,275 | 149,350 | $10,438 |
| Q3 2016 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Sell | -100 | 43,450 | $3,190 |
| Q3 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -11,600 | 102,200 | $7,503 |
Frequently asked questions about SPSC activity
Which institutional owners are buying SPSC?
Institutional owners buying SPSC include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in SPSC activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in SPSC compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to SPS COMMERCE INC (SPSC) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in SPSC increasing?
Institutional interest in SPSC can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.