HP INC (HPQ) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
HP INC (HPQ) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, ARK Invest, Sequoia Financial Advisors, and Mairs & Power Growth Fund. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- HP INC (HPQ) stock institutional ownership
- HP INC (HPQ) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q4 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -42,538 | 1,849,460 | $38,857 |
| Q4 2017 | ARK Invest | Buy | 17,877 | 117,954 | $2,478 |
| Q4 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -921,865 | 4,581,722 | $96,262 |
| Q4 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Sell | -647,300 | 5,977,100 | $125,579 |
| Q3 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -1,476,885 | 115,270,677 | $2,300,803 |
| Q3 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -8,030 | 1,891,998 | $37,764 |
| Q3 2017 | ARK Invest | Buy | 21,462 | 100,077 | $1,998 |
| Q3 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -608,463 | 5,503,587 | $109,852 |
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 3,110,769 | 6,624,400 | $132,223 |
| Q2 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -1,316,512 | 116,747,562 | $2,040,747 |
| Q2 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -120,615 | 1,900,028 | $33,212 |
| Q2 2017 | ARK Invest | Buy | 21,399 | 78,615 | $1,374 |
| Q2 2017 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Buy | 595,035 | 4,128,320 | $72,163 |
| Q2 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -151,008 | 6,112,050 | $106,839 |
| Q1 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -21,687,283 | 118,064,074 | $2,110,986 |
| Q1 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -220,974 | 2,020,643 | $36,129 |
| Q1 2017 | ARK Invest | Buy | 4,512 | 57,216 | $1,023 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 3,418,931 | 3,513,631 | $62,824 |
| Q1 2017 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Buy | 893,655 | 3,533,285 | $63,175 |
| Q1 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -6,039,528 | 6,263,058 | $111,983 |
| Q4 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -6,100 | 26,000 | $386 |
| Q4 2016 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -29,405,342 | 139,751,357 | $2,073,910 |
| Q4 2016 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -46,288 | 2,241,617 | $33,266 |
| Q4 2016 | ARK Invest | Buy | 52,704 | 52,704 | $782 |
| Q4 2016 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Buy | 1,639,530 | 2,639,630 | $39,172 |
| Q4 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -5,009,038 | 12,302,586 | $182,570 |
| Q3 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -2,990 | 32,100 | $499 |
| Q3 2016 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -25,394,161 | 169,156,699 | $2,627,004 |
| Q3 2016 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Sell | -28,237 | 336,241 | $5,222 |
| Q3 2016 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -548,455 | 2,287,905 | $35,531 |
Frequently asked questions about HPQ activity
Which institutional owners are buying HPQ?
Institutional owners buying HPQ include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in HPQ activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in HPQ compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to HP INC (HPQ) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in HPQ increasing?
Institutional interest in HPQ can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.