ELI LILLY & CO (LLY) Institutional Buying Activity

Institutional investors tracked by InsiderSet increased exposure to ELI LILLY & CO (LLY) during the quarter ended June 30, 2026 through a combination of new purchases and expanded existing positions disclosed in SEC Form 13F filings.

The largest institutional buyer of LLY during the latest reporting period was Parnassus Endeavor Fund, which increased its reported LLY position by approximately $719.74M based on quarter-end filing values. Several additional hedge funds and long-term asset managers also reported meaningful increases in LLY exposure during the quarter.

Institutional buying activity can provide insight into investor conviction, sector allocation trends, and smart money positioning toward ELI LILLY & CO (LLY). InsiderSet tracks quarterly accumulation trends, new institutional positions, ownership increases, and estimated performance of newly disclosed holdings using SEC filing data and recent market prices.

The investors highlighted on this page collectively added approximately $5.49B in reported LLY exposure during the latest filing period, reflecting continued institutional interest in ELI LILLY & CO's growth initiatives and strategic positioning.

Portfolio quarterNameTypeQuantityRemainingReported stock balance
Q2 2026Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy11,238154,543$185,363,403
Q1 2026ARK InvestBuy12,67612,676$11,658,637
Q1 2026Lountzis Asset ManagementBuy20312$286,968
Q4 2025Parnassus Endeavor FundBuy382,1121,010,392$1,085,848,074
Q4 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy165,586165,847$178,232,454
Q4 2025Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy1,468147,690$158,719,012
Q3 2025Jensen Investment ManagementBuy257,127463,739$353,832,857
Q3 2025Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy6,021146,222$111,567,553
Q3 2025Matrix Advisors Value FundBuy3328$250,566
Q2 2025Viking Global InvestorsBuy264,880416,918$325,000,089
Q2 2025Jensen Investment ManagementBuy198,892206,612$161,060,252
Q2 2025Tiger Global ManagementBuy176,2001,511,160$1,177,994,555
Q2 2025Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy22,410140,201$109,290,939
Q2 2025Mairs & Power Growth FundBuy534365,327$284,783,356
Q1 2025Polen Capital ManagementBuy459,1821,754,571$1,449,117,615
Q1 2025Egerton Capital UKBuy211,827492,808$407,015,055
Q1 2025Renaissance Technologies LLCBuy42,19296,312$79,546,154
Q1 2025Mairs & Power Growth FundBuy25,526364,793$301,286,187
Q1 2025Tiger Global ManagementBuy25,0001,334,960$1,102,556,814
Q1 2025Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy16,056117,791$97,284,743
Q1 2025Lountzis Asset ManagementBuy292292$256,169
Q1 2025Dodge & Cox Stock FundBuy28945,086$37,236,978
Q1 2025Matrix Advisors Value FundBuy38340$281,029
Q4 2024Parnassus Endeavor FundBuy932,309934,702$721,589,944
Q4 2024Polen Capital ManagementBuy805,4341,295,389$1,000,040,041
Q4 2024Lone Pine CapitalBuy782,860782,860$604,367,920
Q4 2024Tiger Global ManagementBuy340,1601,309,960$1,011,289,120
Q4 2024Egerton Capital UKBuy280,981280,981$216,917,332
Q4 2024Sequoia Financial AdvisorsBuy33,245101,735$78,539,383
Q4 2024Cullen Value FundBuy5312,815$9,893,389

Frequently asked questions about LLY activity

  • Which institutional owners are buying LLY?

    Institutional owners buying LLY include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.

  • What does "buy" mean in LLY activity?

    "Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in LLY compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to ELI LILLY & CO (LLY) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).

  • Is institutional interest in LLY increasing?

    Institutional interest in LLY can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.