GILEAD SCIENCES INC (GILD) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
GILEAD SCIENCES INC (GILD) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q4 2025), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Renaissance Technologies LLC, Ariel Appreciation Fund, Cullen Value Fund, Dodge & Cox Stock Fund, and Sequoia Financial Advisors. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- GILEAD SCIENCES INC (GILD) stock institutional ownership
- GILEAD SCIENCES INC (GILD) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 2,432,300 | 7,707,248 | $523,476 |
| Q1 2017 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Buy | 9,035 | 222,030 | $15,080 |
| Q4 2016 | Torray Fund | Sell | -809 | 165,963 | $11,885 |
| Q4 2016 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -500 | 3,250 | $233 |
| Q4 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -450 | 5,410 | $387 |
| Q4 2016 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Buy | 13,104 | 198,063 | $14,183 |
| Q4 2016 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Buy | 1,378,891 | 12,169,249 | $871,440 |
| Q4 2016 | Ariel Appreciation Fund | Buy | 51,671 | 1,584,199 | $113,444 |
| Q4 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 24,512 | 72,522 | $5,193 |
| Q4 2016 | Arbiter Partners Capital Management | Buy | 103,000 | 135,000 | $9,667 |
| Q4 2016 | Miller Value Partners | Sell | -4,500 | 466,050 | $33,374 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 3,327,900 | 5,274,948 | $377,739 |
| Q4 2016 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Sell | -1,500 | 212,995 | $15,253 |
| Q3 2016 | Torray Fund | Sell | -130,545 | 166,772 | $13,195 |
| Q3 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Buy | 940 | 5,860 | $464 |
| Q3 2016 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Buy | 29,174 | 184,959 | $14,634 |
| Q3 2016 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Buy | 2,329,874 | 10,790,358 | $853,733 |
| Q3 2016 | Ariel Appreciation Fund | Buy | 89,223 | 1,532,528 | $121,254 |
| Q3 2016 | Arbiter Partners Capital Management | Buy | 12,000 | 32,000 | $2,532 |
| Q3 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 4,112 | 48,010 | $3,799 |
| Q3 2016 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Buy | 34,200 | 49,700 | $3,932 |
| Q3 2016 | Miller Value Partners | Sell | -10,000 | 470,550 | $37,230 |
| Q3 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 867,700 | 1,947,048 | $154,050 |
| Q3 2016 | Muhlenkamp & Co | Sell | -2,505 | 214,495 | $16,971 |
| Q2 2016 | Torray Fund | Sell | -156,103 | 297,317 | $24,802 |
| Q2 2016 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -3,870 | 3,750 | $313 |
| Q2 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Buy | 490 | 4,920 | $410 |
| Q2 2016 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Buy | 23,901 | 155,785 | $12,996 |
| Q2 2016 | Parnassus Endeavor Fund | Buy | 2,640,284 | 8,460,484 | $705,774 |
| Q2 2016 | Ariel Appreciation Fund | Buy | 82,813 | 1,443,305 | $120,401 |
Frequently asked questions about GILD activity
Which institutional owners are buying GILD?
Institutional owners buying GILD include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in GILD activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in GILD compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to GILEAD SCIENCES INC (GILD) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in GILD increasing?
Institutional interest in GILD can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.