WALMART INC (WMT) Stock Institutional Trading Activity
WALMART INC (WMT) position changes reported by tracked institutional filers across multiple SEC 13F reporting periods. Based on recent SEC 13F filings (Q1 2026), investors with some of the largest reported share count changes include Sequoia Financial Advisors, Cullen Value Fund, Matrix Advisors Value Fund, Renaissance Technologies LLC, and Joho Capital. Explore insights into buying and selling patterns, position changes, and investment conviction levels to understand institutional trading behavior and market dynamics.
Explore more:
- WALMART INC (WMT) stock institutional ownership
- WALMART INC (WMT) stock insider trading activity
- Stock rankings
| Portfolio quarter | Name | Type | Quantity | Remaining | Reported stock balance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q3 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 979,900 | 6,043,000 | $472,200 |
| Q2 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 51 | 5,496 | $416 |
| Q2 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -11,477 | 1,055,470 | $79,878 |
| Q2 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 19,298 | 5,134,336 | $388,567 |
| Q2 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -135,557 | 21,249,526 | $1,608,164 |
| Q2 2017 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Sell | -520 | 4,500 | $341 |
| Q2 2017 | Sound Shore Management | Sell | -6,887 | 2,277,186 | $172,337 |
| Q2 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 5,087 | 61,232 | $4,634 |
| Q2 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 19,700 | 5,063,100 | $383,175 |
| Q1 2017 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 100 | 5,445 | $392 |
| Q1 2017 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -2,793 | 1,066,947 | $76,906 |
| Q1 2017 | Hancock Classic Value | Buy | 159,994 | 5,115,038 | $368,692 |
| Q1 2017 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -4,706 | 10,019 | $722 |
| Q1 2017 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -384,043 | 21,385,083 | $1,541,437 |
| Q1 2017 | Matrix Advisors Value Fund | Sell | -260 | 5,020 | $362 |
| Q1 2017 | Sound Shore Management | Buy | 162,254 | 2,284,073 | $164,636 |
| Q1 2017 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 5,832 | 56,145 | $4,047 |
| Q1 2017 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 1,084,300 | 5,043,400 | $363,528 |
| Q1 2017 | Tweedy, Browne Co All Funds (US) | Sell | -5,010 | 255,015 | $18,381 |
| Q4 2016 | Mairs & Power Growth Fund | Buy | 188 | 5,345 | $369 |
| Q4 2016 | Yacktman Asset Management | Sell | -27,187 | 1,069,740 | $73,940 |
| Q4 2016 | Hancock Classic Value | Sell | -261,788 | 4,955,044 | $342,493 |
| Q4 2016 | Jensen Investment Management | Sell | -540 | 5,830 | $403 |
| Q4 2016 | Gardner Russo & Quinn | Sell | -8,050 | 14,725 | $1,018 |
| Q4 2016 | Dodge & Cox Stock Fund | Sell | -1,124,832 | 21,769,126 | $1,504,682 |
| Q4 2016 | Sound Shore Management | Buy | 2,121,819 | 2,121,819 | $146,660 |
| Q4 2016 | Berkshire Hathaway | Sell | -11,578,061 | 1,393,513 | $96,320 |
| Q4 2016 | First Eagle U.S. Value | Sell | -1,129,730 | 7,686 | $531 |
| Q4 2016 | Sequoia Financial Advisors | Buy | 4,443 | 50,313 | $3,478 |
| Q4 2016 | Renaissance Technologies LLC | Buy | 1,164,600 | 3,959,100 | $273,653 |
Frequently asked questions about WMT activity
Which institutional owners are buying WMT?
Institutional owners buying WMT include investors who have either initiated new positions or increased their existing holdings based on recent SEC 13F filings. The activity table above highlights which funds added shares in the latest reporting periods and how their positions changed over time.
What does "buy" mean in WMT activity?
"Buy" means an investor increased their reported position in WMT compared to the prior reporting period. This reflects growing exposure to WALMART INC (WMT) rather than necessarily a brand-new position (though new positions also appear as buys when prior quantity was zero).
Is institutional interest in WMT increasing?
Institutional interest in WMT can be assessed by comparing the number of tracked funds adding or increasing positions versus those trimming or exiting across the periods shown. A higher number of additions typically signals increasing participation among large filers, but it should be read alongside position sizes and the full table.